|
[Back] [Home] [Up] [Next]
| |
|
LOCAL
608 NEWSLETTER |
|
|
APRIL/MAY/JUNE
2006
VOLUME II ISSUE X
|
|
Local
Issues |
|
|
|
|
FROM THE DESK
OF USW PRESIDENT: Rian VanLeuven |
|
| Recent events surrounding
times of absence of fellow-members have created questions around the FMLA and
its uses by employees of the mill we work at. During an
investigation for a member in CPD, we had an occasion to contact the
DOL Field rep that deals with questions and concerns of the Family
Medical Leave Act. This person was very helpful in clearing up
some of our questions and in fact the information provided helped us
resolve the issues with the company. We also are intending to
hold steward and membership training utilizing the information and the
Department of Labor folks in July. Basically the employer is
required to notify their employees of the act and that they may
want to investigate applying for leave under the act for serious
health conditions. A serious health condition has a couple of
requirements that need to be satisfied in order to be considered a
serious health condition and then requires paper work to be filled out
and returned to your employer by the employee. It has some
flexibility on how it can be utilized by the employee and is used for
the family member of an employee or for the employee themselves.
We will be asking that all stewards of 608 make one of these
training sessions and that any interested member may also attend. |
|
|
|
|
AFL-CIO
Pushes For Shareholder Power, Curbs On Executive Pay |
|
|
By Mark
Gruenberg, PAI Staff Writer
WASHINGTON (PAI)--Against the backdrop of
crooked Enron CEO Ken Lay getting convicted and facing up to 165 years
in jail, the AFL-CIO joined a wide-ranging group of witnesses in
urging Congress to give the nation’s shareholders more power,
especially in curbing executive pay and perks.
Brandon Rees, assistant director of the
federation’s Office of Investment--which puts together corporate
campaigns and AFL-CIO-sponsored shareholder resolutions-- among other
things--told the House Financial Services Committee on May 25 that
“CEO pay levels are too high” and “a reasonable and fair
compensation system for executives and workers is fundamental to the
creation of long-term corporate value.”
That includes “value” that would boost
the worth of corporate assets within union pension plans, he noted.
“Union-sponsored pension plans hold approximately $400
million, and runaway executive pay has diminished returns for working
families’ pension funds,” he explained.
“Moreover, a poorly designed executive
compensation package can reward decisions that are not in the
long-term interests of a company, its shareholders and its
employees,” Rees added.
“We believe no individual CEO’s
contribution is so positive that they deserve unlimited
compensation,” Rees said during a break in the hearing.
Yet such pay packages “are caused by power imbalances with
companies without independent board chairs, majority voting for
directors and without shareholder resolutions” about pay.
Such compensation packages, what to do
about them and the economic inequality they spotlight between the rich
and the rest of us, were the topic of the hearing, successfully
demanded--using congressional rules--by the committee’s minority
Democrats in the GOP-run Congress.
But whether the legislation Rees and other
witnesses pushed will get anywhere is doubtful.
The measure, by top committee Democrat Barney Frank (D-Mass.),
would mandate greater disclosure--in plain terms—of executive pay
and perks, standards by which boards set those sums, and would give
shareholders the power to vote on executive pay and perk packages.
It would also order directors elected by majority vote of all
outstanding shares, not just of those voting.
But the panel’s ruling Republicans seemed
more interested in extolling the capitalist system--repeatedly using
that phrase—and attacking trial lawyers.
Rees and the other witnesses, including
Christiana Wood, the senior investment officer of the giant employee
pension fund CALPERS, and Nell Minow, of the Corporate Library, which
compiles company compensation data, said there is no question that
executive pay is out of control.
Even the most pro-business witness, Tom
Lehner of The Business Roundtable, answered “no,” when Rep. Bernie
Sanders (I-Vt.) bluntly asked him if “It is morally good” for
executives to raise their pay while “poverty is rising because of
policies encouraged by the Business Roundtable who encourages
companies to throw people out on the street and the companies move to
China.”
 
|
|
|
|
| With
Sappi CEO's Resignation, Union Workers Want New Direction in Labor
Relations |
 |
|
 |
The
United Steelworkers (USW) responded today to the resignation of Sappi
Ltd. CEO Jonathan Leslie by saying the union representing the
company's North American workers is ready and willing to work with a
new management team toward resolving long-outstanding labor relations
issues.
"Union
workers at Sappi plants in the
United States
are hoping to build a new relationship based on trust and mutual
respect," said USW Vice President Dick LaCosse, who leads the
union's paper division. "A new approach from the managers at
Sappi will be beneficial to workers and our communities, as well as
the company's long term success."
At
the time of Leslie's resignation, USW representatives were attending
the Sappi shareholders meeting in
Johannesburg
,
South Africa
, with the union representing Sappi workers in that country. The union
coalition presented corporate governance concerns to the company's
shareholders and directors.
In
the
United States
, three local unions at Sappi paper mills are working under
indefinitely extended agreements while continuing negotiations with
the company. Two of these locals have been stuck in negotiations for
the duration of Leslie's tenure as CEO, which began in April 2003. A
fourth union contract, covering workers at the company's
Cloquet
,
Minnesota
mill, is set to expire on May 15, 2006.
Under
Leslie, union leaders say Sappi management has demanded that workers
accept concessions and has been unwilling to bargain in good faith.
The next negotiations between the company and the USW are scheduled
for March 14 at the Westbrook,
Maine
mill.
"Sappi
now has an opportunity to take a new direction if it chooses,"
LaCosse said. "We would welcome a new approach to our talks with
the company to better secure our jobs, our communities and our
future." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAFETY ISSUES |
|
Consumer Products Division
Lewiston,
Idaho |
 |
July 2006
Phone 799-1924
Volume 10 Issue 7
|
|
 |
|
Be
Ergonomically Correct So Your Body Won't Object |
|
  |
|
Statistics
|
|
Thanks for your observations!
|
|
Observations
|
|
|
2005
|
2006
|
|
|
June
|
Ytd
|
June
|
Ytd
|
|
# of Observations
|
460
|
2,043
|
180
|
2,010
|
|
# of Safe’s
|
4,975
|
20,766
|
1,990
|
19,531
|
|
# of @ Risks
|
281
|
1,215
|
108
|
1,295
|
|
Painful
Experiences
|
|
|
2005
|
2006
|
|
|
June
|
Ytd
|
June
|
Ytd
|
|
Recordable
|
2
|
9
|
1
|
8
|
|
Lost Time
|
1
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
|
Inc. Rate
|
4.38
|
3.26
|
2.18
|
2.83
|
In the month of June, employees
were observed with good eyes on path, doing all pre-job inspections
when needed, and properly operating vehicles and in some areas the
lighting and walking working surfaces are improving.
Last month observations showed the POWER group that people are
not taking the time to use 3pt contact.
Also, we have been seeing many items at risk in housekeeping
and as always ergonomics proves to be a risk in all departments.
Take the time to pick up around you, grab the hand rail up and
down the stairs, and stretch whenever needed. |
|
When
the Standard Lift Won’t Work |
|
We’ve
all been trained to lift safely by squatting down and picking up the
object with both hands. That’s
fine when you can maneuver yourself into this position next to the
item you are lifting. Squatting down instead of bending at the waist
can help prevent back injuries by putting the load on your legs rather
than your back. But
this is not always possible to use this lifting method. For example,
many of us spend a good part of the work day picking components out of
deep bins. Because the
sides of the bin prevent you from bending your knees, you may try to
lean over the side and pick up the material with both hands. This
method puts a strain on your easily injured lower back.
If the item you are picking out of the bin isn’t too heavy or
too awkward to handle with one hand, there’s a better way to do it.
Use a one-handed lift, also known as the golfer’s lift.
Here’s how it is done:
- Stand
close to the bin.
- Put
your non-lifting hand on the side of the bin.
- Bend
over the container. You can also put one foot out behind you for
balance.
- Pick
up the object with one hand.
- Use
your non-lifting hand to push your body back up out of the bin. Make
sure your arms and shoulders take the load, not your back.
Look
for ways to eliminate heavy or awkward lifts from your work routine.
Perhaps the parts bin can be tilted so you can reach items more
easily. Get help with
heavy or difficult loads.
Here are some more reminders about safe lifting:
- Clear
your route before you attempt to move an object. Make sure you have a
clear pathway and a place to set the load down easily.
- Check
the weight of the object to see if you can handle it. Look at the
weight on the label, or lift a corner of the object.
- Keep
the load close to your body as you carry it and set it down.
- Lift
the object straight up smoothly and do not twist your body once you
have made the lift.
A modified
one-handed lifting technique may be useful in some situations, such as
picking items out of a large container. No matter how you lift,
protect your back from injury. |
|
|
|
On
April 19, 2005, a bipartisan coalition reintroduced into Congress the
historic Employee
Free Choice Act (S. 842 and H.R. 1696).
The Employee Free Choice Act would strengthen protections for
workers’ freedom to choose by requiring employers to recognize a
union after a majority of workers signs cards authorizing union
representation. It also would provide for mediation and arbitration of
first-contract disputes and authorize stronger penalties for violation
of the law when workers seek to form a union.
Find out more about the AFL-CIO
Voice@Work campaign, and read the AFL-CIO
Now bloggers on the Employee Free Choice Act.
Click here for a list of the co-sponsors of the U.S. House
and Senate bills.
Let
Congress know you support the Employee Free Choice Act.
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Senator
Dorgan Introduces Landmark Legislation
Watershed
Anti-sweatshop Legislation Introduced in the U.S. Congress
June
12th, 2006
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- Watershed Anti-sweatshop Legislation Introduced in the U.S.
Congress
-- Senator Dorgan's Press Release
Watershed
Anti-sweatshop Legislation Introduced in the U.S. Congress
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For the first time, anti-sweatshop legislation has been
introduced in the U.S. Congress which will prohibit the import,
export or sale of sweatshop goods in the U.S. Up to this point, it
has been the companies that have demanded and won all sorts of
enforceable laws--intellectual property and copyright laws backed up
by sanctions--to defend their corporate trademarks, labels and
products. Yet, the corporations have long said that extending similar
laws to protect the human rights of the 16-year-old girl in Bangladesh
who sews the garment would be "an impediment to free trade."
Under this distorted sense of values, the label is protected, but not
the human being, the worker who makes the product.
On Thursday, June 8, in what I believe will be looked back upon as
a watershed moment Senator Byron Dorgan introduced Senate Bill
3485, "The Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition
Act" which will, for the first time, hold corporations
legally accountable to respect the core International Labor
Organization worker rights standards --no child labor, no forced
labor, freedom of association, right to organize and bargain
collectively and to decent working conditions. The legislation also
includes an important right to private action, which gives individuals
and organizations to sue corporations for violating the law. Further,
Senator Dorgan’s legislation establishes strict sweat-free
procurement standards to condition all Federal Government purchases.
Just as it took 20 years of struggle and debate to turn the ideas,
values and vision of the New Deal into reality, we can expect a
similar struggle now to re-make our economy with a human face.
A companion bill will be introduced this week in the House of
Representatives.
Companies have been anxious to send the American people down the
path of voluntary corporate codes of conduct and private monitoring
schemes, which they know are a dead end leading to the privatization
of human rights. The corporate joyride is over. We will accept nothing
less that legal protections for human and worker rights.
The focus of this effort is not "inside the Beltway" in
Washington. Rather, this legislation will be the vehicle for a massive
popular education, outreach and mobilization campaign to take back our
economy and remake it with a human face. Working people in communities
all across America will finally have a positive alternative vision to
business-as-usual in the global sweatshop economy.
The National Labor Committee, the United Steelworkers union and
many others have worked for years to help create this positive
alternative, one based on enforceable laws to protect human and worker
rights.
Please spread the word. This campaign belongs to all of us, and we
need your ideas on how to build momentum.
Read
more about the legislation here!
Senator
Dorgan's Press Release
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DORGAN INTRODUCES BILL TO BAN SALE OF SWEATSHOP PRODUCTS
(WASHINGTON, D.C.) --- U.S. Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) introduced
legislation Thursday to prohibit the U.S. sale of products produced in
“sweatshop factories” abroad.
The ban would be enforced with fines of up to $10,000 for each
violation, and a provision that allows competitors of retailers who
sell sweatshop-produced products to sue for damages for each
violation. Sweatshop factories would be defined under the legislation
as factories that abuse their workers in violation of that country’s
labor laws.
“Free trade” agreements negotiated between the U.S. and other
countries have fueled a growth in sweatshop production, Dorgan said,
since products produced by those countries enter the United States
duty free.
A 1999 “free trade” agreement with Jordan was supposed to have
created jobs for Jordanians and protected workers, but had the exact
opposite effect, Dorgan said.
Jordan began flying in so-called “guest workers” from even
lower-wage countries like Bangladesh and China to make products in
Jordan for sale at stores like Wal-Mart. Working conditions for those
workers were “slave-like,” Dorgan said. They were forced to work
20 hour days, often weren’t paid for months, and were often hit by
supervisors and jailed when they complained. One worker was paid only
$50 for five months of work.
“What we ended up with under the Jordanian Free Trade Agreement
are Bangladeshi workers, working 120 hours a week, turning Chinese
cloth into clothing for the U.S. market, which enters duty-free in the
U.S. market,” Dorgan said.
Jordanian exports to the U.S. increased twenty five fold since the
agreement took effect in 1999.
“It’s all part of a global strategy of big corporate interests
to find the cheapest possible labor and to exploit free trade
agreements,” Dorgan said.
“The best way to put a stop to it is to simply prohibit the sale
of products sold in sweatshops, and make sure there are powerful
incentives to see that the prohibition is respected and enforced,”
Dorgan said.
Click
here to read Senator Dorgan's legislation...
Contact
Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
phone: 212-242-3002
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Powered by
National Labor Committee | 540
West 48th St. | 3rd Floor | New York | NY | 10036 |
|
|
|
Joke: DEAR
FRIENDS & RELATIVES:
I have the distinguished honor of being on the committee to raise
$5,000,000 for a
monument
of
George W. Bush
. We originally wanted to put him on
Mt.
Rushmore
until we discovered there was not enough room for two more faces.
We then decided to erect a statue of George in the Washington, D. C.
Hall Of Fame.
We were in a quandary as to where the statue should be placed. It was
not proper to place it beside the statue of George Washington, who
never told a lie, or beside Dick Cheney, who never told the truth,
since George could never tell the difference.
We finally decided to place it beside Christopher Columbus, the
greatest Republican of them all. He left not knowing where he was
going, and when he got there he did not know where he was. He returned
not knowing where he had been, and did it all on someone else's money.
Thank you,
George
W.
Bush
Monument
. Committee
P. S. The Committee has raised $1.35 so far!
This
comes to us from an affiliate, Mark Wurtzbacher, fellow Steelworker
from Marietta, OH.
|
|
|
|
|
Mexican Union Leader Seeking
Support Not Asylum - Steelworkers
|
|
|
May 31, 2006
Ottawa - United Steelworkers’ National Director
Ken Neumann said Wednesday that rumours circulating in Mexico that
union leader Napoleon Gomez Urrutia is seeking political asylum in
Canada are false and diverting attention away from the issue of
seeking justice and reinstatement for Gomez as the
democratically-elected leader of the National Union of Mine and
Metallurgical Workers of the Mexican Republic (known as Los Mineros).
“Mr. Gomez is a guest of the United
Steelworkers in Canada,” said Neumann.
“He is meeting with representatives of the opposition parties
in Ottawa to update Canadian politicians about the war of persecution
being waged by the Mexican government and to seek support for his
reinstatement.”
Neumann added that Canadian Steelworkers
have already sent messages to representatives of the Mexican
Government in Canada that Canadians are appalled by the actions the
government has taken against Gomez, who is still supported by his
membership.
“The Mexican government is responsible for his
removal from office and must ensure that he is re-instated, not forced
to seek asylum in some other country.”
Neumann said the only ‘crime’ committed by
Gomez is that he spoke out to protect his membership and to demand an
investigation into the mine disaster at the Pasta de Conchos coal
mine, which killed 65 workers and left their families devastated.
“Our union in Canada worked for more than a
decade to bring about legislation that holds corporations, their
directors and executives criminally accountable for putting workers
lives at risk,” he said. “The
basis for that lengthy lobbying effort was the Westray mine explosion
that took 26 lives in 1992. No
one in our union was ever threatened with removal from office for
speaking out. Mexican
workers and their representatives deserve no less for defending their
rights.
“We believe the government of Mexico must prove
that it believes in democracy and not state-sponsored intimidation and
bullying.”
Opposition parties are being asked to
support the following actions:
¨
That the Mexican government restore Napoleon Gomez to
his democratically-elected position of General Secretary of Los
Mineros;
¨
That the Mexican government uphold its own labour laws
that give unions broad authority to regulate their internal affairs in
accordance with their constitution;
¨
That the Mexican government uphold Article 3 of the
International Labour Organization’s Convention 87 governing worker
and employer organizations and their relationship to national
governments, a convention which is incorporated into Mexican labour
law at a level below that of the Constitution but above federal labour
law;
¨
That the Mexican government honour the 65 miners killed
at work by undertaking a complete investigation into the explosion at
the Pasta de Conchos mine.
Napoleon Gomez can be reached over the next
two days through the contacts listed below.
CONTACT: Dennis Deveau - 613.791.3440
Roger
Falconer - 416.948.4515
|
|
|
|
JUNE'S
UNION CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONGRATULATIONS
LEWIS CLARK WARRIORS!
|
1
Union Meeting Tonight @ 7pm
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11. click:Tanner
Frei Invitational: Golf Tournament.
Bryden Canyon.
Tee Times start @ 9am $60 team
fee in advance. Green fees at course. Call 758-6827
for info.
|
12
|
12
|
14
|
15
E-Board @ 5pm
Union Meeting Tonight @ 7pm
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
CLC Meeting Tonight @ 7pm
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nation-wide
Issues |
|
 |
|
Ask
Your Representative: ‘Where Do You Stand?’
|
|

Members of Congress who support an increase in the minimum wage
have signed a “discharge petition” that would bring the bill to
the House floor. Is your representative among them? Take action today
to find out.

|
|
|
Dear Members,
You should know where your member of Congress stands on raising the
minimum wage. Contact your U.S. representative’s office today and
ask whether he or she will fight to raise the minimum wage.
Click
Here to Take Action
The Republican leadership in the House has refused to allow a vote
on a bill (H.R. 2429) that would increase the minimum wage to $7.25
per hour over two years. So working family advocates have signed a
“discharge petition” that will force a vote on the bill—if a
majority of representatives signs it.
We need 218 signatures on the discharge petition. We have 188.
Find out whether your member of Congress has publicly declared his
or her support for a minimum wage increase by signing the discharge
petition.
Click
Here to Take Action
An increase in the minimum wage would immediately help millions of
working families struggling to make ends meet, including many of the
37 million Americans living in poverty. A full-time worker earning the
minimum wage earns just $10,700 per year—below the poverty line even
for a family of three. The wage hasn’t been increased from $5.15 per
hour since 1997, and its buying power drops every day.
Since the wage was last increased, Congress has voted itself
$31,600 in raises. Find out today whether your member of Congress has
signed the discharge petition to bring the minimum wage increase to
the House floor for a vote:
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/minwage_dp
Thank you for everything you do.
In solidarity,
Working Families e-Activist Network, AFL-CIO
|
|
Find out more at the
AFL-CIO Now news
blog.
|
 |
|
Buy Union Made at
The Union Shop
Online.


|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Members,
|
Call Congress Now
Tell Your
Representative:
Vote “No” on the
Tax Bill
|
|

Here’s what
you can tell your representative when you call:
“Vote
‘No’ on the tax reconciliation bill. We don’t need more tax cuts
for the wealthiest Americans putting our country deeper in debt.”

|
|
|
We need you to take action immediately. Republican leaders in the
House and Senate are planning a vote on legislation that would
extend big tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans, putting America
deeper into debt when we can least afford it.
This vote is happening in the House today. Please
call your representative right now and tell him or her to vote against
the tax reconciliation bill.
Call Your U.S.
Representative Now—It’s a Toll-Free Call
800-459-1887
This $70 billion tax bill gives big breaks to the rich, while working
families pay the price. Middle-income families will receive an
average cut of just $20 from this bill, while the 0.2 percent of
households with income over $1 million will get an average cut of
$42,000, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
If this bill passes, we'll see cuts in education, child care,
job training, services for the elderly and many health programs.
More tax cuts for the rich and more cuts to vital services? These
aren’t our priorities. Call your representative today
and tell him or her to vote against the tax reconciliation bill.
Call Your U.S.
Representative Now Toll-Free
800-459-1887
Thank you for all that you do.
In solidarity,
Working Families e-Activist Network, AFL-CIO

|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ask your representative whether he or she has taken
action to support a minimum-wage increase.

|
|
|
Dear Members,
In just the past week, more than 15,000 people have written to
their U.S. representatives and asked them whether they support a
minimum-wage increase. The response has been overwhelming because
working people are fed up and know that low-income workers desperately
need a raise now.
The iron is hot. It’s time to send a clear message that millions
of working families need a minimum-wage increase now. Write your
representative today.
Click
Here to Take Action
Let's look at the numbers. The federal minimum wage is stuck at
just $5.15 an hour, and it has not been increased since 1997.
Since then, members of Congress have voted to raise their own
salaries six times, totaling $31,600 a year. Compare that to the
$10,712 someone working full time at the minimum wage earns.
But the Republican leadership has blocked legislation to increase
the minimum wage from coming to a vote.
Enough is enough. Send a message to your representative asking if
he or she has signed the discharge petition that will bring a
minimum-wage increase to the House floor for a vote:
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/minwage_dp
Thank you for all you do.
In solidarity,
Working Families e-Activist Network, AFL-CIO
|
|
Find out more at the
AFL-CIO Now news
blog.
|
 |
|
Buy Union Made at
The Union Shop
Online.


|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Members,
|


Send a letter to McDonald's CEO Jim Skinner and
Chipotle CEO Steve Ells demanding that they sign an agreement
with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers to improve wages and
conditions for farm workers.

|
|
|
Farm workers who pick tomatoes for McDonald's hamburgers and
Chipotle's burritos earn about 45 cents for every 32-pound container
of tomatoes they pick, working from dawn to dusk without the right to
overtime pay. That means they have to pick more than 3,500 pounds of
tomatoes to earn $50. The 45-cent piece rate has not changed in nearly
30 years. Annual income for farm workers is extremely low--averaging
$7,500 to $10,000, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.
The vast majority of these farm workers receive no benefits: no
health insurance, no sick leave and no vacation pay. Some families
live in 10-foot by 10-foot rooms and pay $160 a week in rent, while
McDonald's earns huge profits--$2.28 billion last year.
Please take action today to help end these deplorable conditions.
Tell McDonald's and Chipotle to support fair wages for farm workers
and sign an agreement with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers.
Click
Here to Take Action
Last year, Taco Bell signed an agreement with the Coalition of
Immokalee Workers to pay an additional one cent per pound for tomatoes
it purchases. But McDonald's and Chipotle (initially a subsidiary of
McDonald's and now a publicly traded company in which McDonald's is
the controlling shareholder) have refused to sign a similar agreement
to raise wages in the fields.
Although Chipotle's manifesto, titled "Food With
Integrity," takes a strongly activist stance for humane
conditions in its supply chain for farm animals, the manifesto says
nothing about the conditions under which people are laboring to
harvest its produce.
The Coalition of Immokalee Workers is calling on Chipotle to expand
its "Food With Integrity" mission to include "Work With
Dignity" for farm workers who harvest its tomatoes by improving
wages and allowing workers to participate in the protection and
advancement of their own rights. Further, the coalition is
calling on Chipotle to ask McDonald's to join Taco Bell in improving
wages and human rights in the fields.
Send a letter to McDonald's CEO Jim Skinner and Chipotle CEO Steve
Ells demanding that they sign the agreement with the Coalition of
Immokalee Workers to improve wages and conditions for farm workers.
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/farmworkers/
Thank you for all you do.
In solidarity,
The Working Families e-Activist Network, AFL-CIO

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|