|
608
TABLE
TALK
712
2009 Issue #8
December
Countdown
to Contract – 275 days
The Strike
Vote
The
use of a successful strike vote empowers our bargaining team with an
effective tool for negotiating a fair contract. It is not a vote “for a
strike” and it does not necessarily mean a STRIKE will happen
immediately or at all. It tells the employer that the union’s members
are unified and support the negotiating team.
It is an unfortunate reality that rarely do
workers make substantial gains without the threat of job-action. Often a
strike mandate alone is sufficient to get the Employer to take the Union
seriously in negotiations but not always. It would be irresponsible for
the Standing Committee to recommend strike action until every available
option for reaching an agreement has been exhausted.
Our first priority is to negotiate a fair and
equitable agreement on behalf of our membership. Strike action is a last
resort.
EXPRESS SCRIPTS
In a future survey, you’ll
be asked if you’ve had any problems with receiving medications from
Express Scripts. For example, were you sent the wrong meds; did they
arrive late; were they shipped to the wrong address or were there
problems in delivery with meds sensitive to heat or cold.
You’ll also be asked if you’d prefer to
drop Express Scripts and go back to the way we purchased our drugs
before 2007.
If you were hired recently, you may not
know that prior to our current contract, we bought our prescriptions
locally and claims were handled by Regence Blue Shield. Our copays were
10%, which were applied to our medical/surgical out-of-pocket maximums.
Our current contract gave our
prescription business to Express Scripts, one of the nation’s “big
three” mail order pharmacies. While we can still purchase locally, our
copays are less expensive when we purchase from Express Scripts.
However, prescription copays are no
longer applied to our medical/surgical out-of-pocket maximums. Our meds
are fully paid when our copays for generic and preferred brand name
drugs add up to $500 per person or $1,000 per family. There is no
stop-loss for non-preferred brand name drugs.
PENSION
UPDATE
According
to Jim Kidder, an hourly representative to our pension’s Board of
Trustees, the Trustees have decided no changes to our benefit level,
early retirement penalties, etc., need to be made at this time. This is
because the fund’s investments are recovering as the market begins its
climb out of the recession.
The Trustees
have made adjustments to our investment strategies and will continue to
monitor progress. They will meet again in April. However, at this time,
as long as the market continues its recovery, the Trustees believe no
further action will be needed to restore the fund to a healthy funding
level.
Some 23,000
employees from 300 companies participate in our pension. Of those,
712-608 members lead the way in early retirements per membership capita.
The Trustees would like our members to understand that if you are
considering retirement just to secure retirement benefits, you might
want to reconsider. For one thing, the fund is recovering with no
changes in benefits anticipated at this time and for another, if our
funding level falls to the point where the federal government has to
step in, all participants, both active and retired will see their
benefits reduced.
If you didn’t
know, our pension benefit levels are in two parts: $100 per month for
every year of service to December 31, 2005 and $75 per month for each
year of service since January 1, 2006. Because 2006 was a contract year
for our two locals, the pension Trustees granted us an exception for
that year to receive the $100 per month benefit until September 1.
Our early
retirement penalties are as follows: For the $100 per month benefit
level, 3% a year for ages 60-65 and 6% for ages 60-55; for the $75 per
month benefit, 6% for each year for ages 65-55.
Our joint
712-608 pension committee members are for 712, Doug Piper, CPD I/M, Phil
Stevens, CPD planner and Mark Rhodes, IPP planner and for 608, Jerry
Enyeart, IPP Shipping and Brent Reed, CPD I-Fold
Percentage
Raise Versus a Flat Rate Raise
This
is a side by side comparison of a percentage wage increase as opposed to
a flat rate raise or across the board raise.
Based on $20/hr
for this example – 2.5% was applied to $20, which is $.50, then that
amount was used as the flat rate raise.
As you can see,
year for year a percentage wage increase makes more sense.
2.5%/hr Raise
Flat rate Raise $.50/hr
Year
$/hr Year $/hr
1
20.50 1 20.50
2
21.012 2 21
3
21.535 3 21.50
4
22.068 4 22
5
22.611 5 22.50
6
23.176 6 23
7
23.755 7 23.50
8
24.348 8 24
9
24.956 9 24.50
10
25.579 10 25
The Table Talk
will be archived at www.usw-608.com. If you have any ideas for future
issues, please feel free to send them to our e-mail address:
catoffice@cableone.net If you would like the Table Talk sent to your
home computer, email the CAT office with your home email address.
|